Title: The Map of Heaven
Author: Eben Alexander
Published: October 7, 2014
Publisher: Simon & Schuster
Source: ARC
Before I came across an ARC of Eben Alexander’s Map of Heaven, the most I’d heard about him was that he was some doctor that had gotten sick; and gone into a coma and had a dream about butterflies. Well from the preface (and I almost 
never read that part) of his new book he had my attention. Given the last few books I reviewed (some DNF’d) I was kinda losing hope for the genre, as in there were no genuine contributions to such a new and emerging space in the publishing world. But Alexander put all of my worries to rest. First of all he has enticed me to want to read his first book Proof of Heaven; which I have not yet read, but now I look forward to it. Alexander’s ability to present his arguments with some of the founding fathers of science and medicine is impeccable. Reaching as far back as Newton and even to the two pillars of philosophy Plato and Socrates; citing Plato one of Socrates disciples’ allegory of the cave. basically using what is normally perceived as people in a cave chained to a wall with a myopic view of the world outside of them because they can not see shadows on the wall by the light of the fire. This is analogous to what Alexander believes is the current state of science, and the empirical world as we know it. Being part of that scientific community, and fully initiated into this fraternity he’s uses figures like Socrates and Plato who were the top minds of their time in greek culture to illustrate how much we are off the mark. That is not to out do the fact that science has and is making a lot of contributions to the world as we know it. It’s just that after his NDE Alexander live only in the observable universe anymore. He quotes Plato on a number of occasions citing “what we call learning is only a process of recollection.” I love this notion of an observer in the midst of consciousness. Or the awareness that is aware as I have heard it in other places. This book was one of great introspection on the part of Alexander. He does a great job at backing up his claims with the research and facts from other revered figures in the scientific community, this text comes complete with a references in the footnote section at the end of each chapter. But this reader was not compelled to fact check Mr. Alexander, but it’s great to know that the window is left open to all who would like to.
There is no doubt that this book is a response to those in the scientific community who wrote off Alexander’s claims in Proof of Heaven as a simple firing of oxygen deprived neurons. But what Alexander did instead of speak overtly and unequivocally to his naysayers amazed me more and kept me totally engaged while reading his seven chapter curtain call. He gave a voice to the hordes of folks who wrote to him their testimonials of similar experiences, whether they were first hand or second hand 
experiences. While presiding over the marriage of the metaphysical and scientific community; he simultaneously built a cake layering his commentary with the italicized personal accounts of those he’s encountered on speaking engagements as well as those who’ve written him since the publication of Proof of Heaven.
If you are looking for an intelligent discussion on the subject of NDEs, and the existence of consciousness beyond the physical body I highly suggest you scoop this title up when it hits bookstores on October 7th.
Twitter: @LifeBeyondD
Website: http://www.ebenalexander.com/
my plate is a little thing called 
this fall. Upon just flipping through the first few chapters I am really excited about it. I know it seems like I only review books that i like, or am excited about. But I think I do. I also think it’s possible to write a book without running leading your reader in 50 directions at once. The biggest stumbling block for me with this Mira Kelly title is that she throws this huge concept of ‘oversouls’ and parallel lives out there without really ever preparing the reader. She relays her initial reaction to the phenomena but outside of that there isn’t much else for me to go on, that concept alone sparked a trajectory toward rejection on my part with this title from the moment Kelly introduced it. I am pushing through this title. but I don’t have to like it. But in order to give an informed review and criticism i must push through. To be clear this isn’t just a Kelly issue, it’s a Hay House issue. I am not sure why they pander to these kinds of audiences, but it doesn’t seem to gel together well to me. I might be wrong, but so far this book isn’t panning out too well. And in all honesty with all this over soul and parallel universe business they could have made this about 3 books. I could be slow but I feel like they are stretching the minds of their audience too fast too much. the plasticity of the mind is like delicate bread dough to be slowly pulled and stretched. this takes patience guys patience.
I am back on the wagon again, on that long road to infinity. The pendulum has begun to swing back in my direction. And with any hope I will be back in the swing of things (no pun intended). But I will be in Washington D.C, in a weeks time to see Oprah and Friends on her 
I would highly recommend 
Kopavi Kommunique 